With about 200 billion stars in our galaxy and billions of galaxies in the observable Universe, the probability that intelligent life exists elsewhere seems mathematically certain. Yet, after more than six decades of active research (since Project Ozma in 1960) and thousands of hours of radio and optical listening, we have detected no clearly artificial signal, no indisputable technological trace.
This contrast between statistical expectation and total lack of evidence constitutes the Fermi Paradox, and its corollary that scientists call The Great Silence.
The Universe is 13.8 billion years old. Our technological civilization capable of emitting radio signals has existed for only about 200 years. For interstellar dialogue to be possible, two conditions must be met simultaneously: two civilizations must exist at the same time and be sufficiently spatially close.
The probability that a given civilization is active at the same time as ours depends on its average lifespan \(L\). If we optimistically assume that a technological civilization lasts 10,000 years (which is already 50 times our current age), the probability of temporal overlap over the age of the Universe \(T = 13.8 \times 10^9\) years is about one in 1.4 million.
If we compress the history of the Universe into one year (365 days), each day represents about 38 million years. A 10,000-year civilization would then last less than 0.002 seconds. The probability that two of these cosmic "blinks" occur simultaneously is infinitesimal.
The speed of light (\(c = 299,792\ \text{km/s}\)) is an absolute cosmic limit (special relativity). This universal constant, while immense on our scale, becomes derisory in the face of interstellar distances. Even with automated probes at subluminal speeds, the propagation time on a galactic scale would remain on the order of hundreds of thousands of years.
But the obstacle goes far beyond mere communication delay. The equation \(E = mc^2\) implies that accelerating even a modest mass to a speed close to \(c\) requires energy tending towards infinity. For example, to accelerate a 1-ton probe to 90% of the speed of light, the required energy is on the order of the current global energy consumption for several months.
These constraints make any interstellar conversation absurd and any manned travel impossible. Advanced civilizations, if they exist, would face these same physical laws.
Economist Robin Dale Hanson (1959-) proposes the idea of a Great Filter. His reasoning starts from a simple observation: on Earth, it took about 4.5 billion years to go from the formation of the planet to a technological civilization capable of emitting radio signals.
If the development of intelligent life were a probable or common process in the galaxy, given that many stars are older than the Sun, we should observe traces of civilizations much older and more advanced than ours. The fact that we see nothing suggests that at least one step in this long evolutionary chain is extremely unlikely, which is the Great Filter.
The unlikely step could be, for example, the transition from unicellular to complex multicellular life (which took about 3 billion years on Earth). If this is the case, we are a rare galactic exception and the silence is explained by the extreme rarity of intelligent life.
This filter, wherever it is, is very effective at preventing the emergence or persistence of civilizations visible on a galactic scale.
The "habitable zone," where water can exist in liquid form, is only the first filter in a long series of conditions necessary for the emergence and maintenance of a complex biosphere. Earth benefits from an exceptional convergence of factors that could be extraordinarily rare in the galaxy, such as plate tectonics, a protective magnetic field, the existence of a stabilizing moon, etc.
Even with all these conditions met, the transition from prebiotic chemistry to the first living cell (LUCA) remains one of the greatest scientific mysteries. On Earth, this event occurred relatively early (within the first 800 million years), but this does not prove its probability. The space of possible molecular combinations is so vast that the spontaneous emergence of a self-replicating system could have an extremely low probability.
The "Rare Earth" hypothesis proposed by Peter Ward (1949-) and Donald Brownlee (1943-) suggests that the combination of all these astronomical, geological, chemical, and biological factors is so exceptional that planets like Earth could be extremely rare.
Life on Earth has existed for about 3.7 billion years. For most of this history, it remained unicellular. Complex multicellular life only appeared during the Cambrian explosion, "only" 541 million years ago. Since then, billions of species have appeared and disappeared, but only one (ours) has developed technological intelligence capable of emitting signals into space.
This singularity suggests that human-like intelligence is not an inevitable outcome of evolution, but rather a contingency in evolutionary history. If we replayed the tape of life and restarted it from its initial conditions, in 3.7 billion years, evolution would not reproduce current technological intelligence.
The advent of technology brings not only communication and exploration capabilities, but also exponentially more powerful means of destruction. This correlation between technological power and the power of self-annihilation suggests that technological civilizations may have an intrinsically limited lifespan, a phenomenon sometimes called the "sustainability filter".
Astronomer Michael H. Hart (1932-) was one of the first to formalize this idea in his 1975 article "Explanation for the Absence of Extraterrestrials on Earth". He argued that even if civilizations were common, they would disappear rapidly after reaching a certain technological level, too quickly to colonize the galaxy or establish lasting communication.
In this scenario, the Great Silence does not indicate the absence of intelligent life in the galactic past, but rather that the "noisy" phase (emitting detectable signals) of a civilization is extraordinarily brief (perhaps a few millennia) before it collapses or mutates into a silent form.
The "galactic zoo" hypothesis, formulated by astronomer John A. Ball (1941-) in 1973, proposes that sufficiently advanced extraterrestrial civilizations know of our existence, but deliberately observe a strict policy of non-intervention. They would study us from a distance, like naturalists observing a preserved ecological reserve, waiting for our civilization to reach a threshold of technological or ethical maturity before considering any contact.
The zoo hypothesis raises profound questions about the nature of science. It is described as "non-falsifiable" by some, as it can explain both the presence and absence of evidence. For physicist Enrico Fermi (1901-1954), if such civilizations existed, they should have left traces of their activities elsewhere in the galaxy, making the hypothesis of deliberate silence unlikely on a large scale.
Our search for extraterrestrial signals is based on a human cognitive tendency: to look for answers or solutions where it is easiest to look, like a man searching for his lost keys under a lamppost, not because he thinks he lost them there, but because that's where the light is strongest.
Our current approach assumes that extraterrestrials would communicate according to our own criteria. However, as astronomer Sebastian von Hoerner (1919-2003) already pointed out, a much older civilization may have long abandoned electromagnetic communication for more sophisticated methods, just as we have largely abandoned smoke signals for the internet.
A civilization could be perfectly "noisy" by its own standards, but completely undetectable to us.
The classic model of galactic colonization, such as the one popularized by the "colonization wave" equation, is based on a fundamental assumption: any advanced technological civilization will inevitably seek to spread physically throughout the galaxy, exploiting the resources of other star systems. However, a civilization that has crossed a certain technological and energetic threshold could follow a radically different trajectory, which some authors call the "inward turn" or the "post-expansionist transition".
If this hypothesis is true, the Milky Way could be populated by ancient, wise, and silent civilizations, perfectly capable of traveling between stars but choosing not to do so. They would be "invisible" not due to lack of capability, but due to lack of interest. The Great Silence would then not be a paradox, but the expected consequence of a certain civilizational maturity.
The aphorism that "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence" finds its full application here. Our efforts to detect intelligent extraterrestrial life are extraordinarily limited compared to the immensity of the parameters to be explored. We have examined only a fraction of the billions of stars in the Milky Way, only a fraction of the electromagnetic spectrum, only a fraction of the sky for short and intermittent durations, etc.
Astronomer Jill Tarter (1944-), an iconic figure of SETI, often compares our current search to "having taken a glass of water from the ocean and, finding no fish, concluding that the ocean is empty". The real paradox, in this perspective, may not be the silence of the Universe, but our own impatience in drawing cosmological conclusions from such a ridiculously small sample.
The Drake Equation formalizes this questioning: \(N = R^* \times f_p \times n_e \times f_l \times f_i \times f_c \times L\). Each factor represents an unknown probability. If the product is large, where are they? If the product equals 1, we are alone.
| Symbol | Parameter | Definition | Optimistic Value (Drake, 1961) | Modern Estimate (Consensus) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| \(\mathbf{N}\) | Number of civilizations | Number of communicating civilizations in the Milky Way at any given time | \(N \approx 10\) | Between \(N \approx 10^{-5}\) and \(N \approx 10^4\) |
| \(R^*\) | Star formation rate | Number of stars forming per year in the Milky Way | 10/year | 1-3/year |
| \(f_p\) | Fraction of stars with planets | Proportion of stars with a planetary system | 0.5 | \(\approx 1\) (almost all) |
| \(n_e\) | Habitable planets per system | Average number of planets in the habitable zone per planetary system | 2 | 0.1 - 0.3 |
| \(f_l\) | Fraction where life appears | Proportion of habitable planets where life actually emerges | 1 | Unknown (0 to 1) "Rapid on Earth" argument: possibly high "Rare Earth" argument: very low |
| \(f_i\) | Fraction with intelligent life | Proportion of planets with life where human-like intelligence develops | 0.01 | Very uncertain (10\(^{-3}\) to 1) Depends on evolutionary contingency |
| \(f_c\) | Communicating fraction | Proportion of intelligent civilizations that develop technology to communicate over interstellar distances | 0.01 | 0.1 - 1 (if intelligence ⇒ technology) But could be 0 if early self-destruction |
| \(L\) | Lifespan of communicating civilizations | Average duration (in years) during which a civilization emits detectable signals | 10,000 years | Extremely uncertain 100 to 10\(^6\) years depending on assumptions Our current \(L\): ~100 years |